The short answer is… almost certainly yes!. He was a Hebrew and a rabi. It would have been extremely rare for any man in that society to be single..
BUT
Jesus could only have been married if He had no Children. Yes, Children would have to be capitalized for His Children would be begotten of God (Jesus,) not created. They would be Gods.
Furthermore, if Jesus had Children, regardless of the sins of His wife, His Children would have been born sinless, just like Jesus. Sin is passed down patriarchally (doctrine of original sin) through Adam to everyone except Jesus, since Jesus’ Father is God, not Joseph, and Jesus was therefore sinless. The Bible states how sin is passed down in the following verse.
“Nevertheless death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over them that had not sinned after the similitude of Adam’s transgression, who is the figure of him that was to come.” Romans 5:14
Now, even if you don’t accept the doctrine of original sin, Paul would have known about Jesus’ Children, if He had them, and Paul therefore would not have referred to Jesus as the Last Adam in his writings because the Children of Jesus would have been the 3rd Adam or the 2nd Eve and so forth. Even if you claim that Paul might not have known, it wouldn’t matter, Paul was writing Scripture, inspired by the Holy Spirit. That made what Paul wrote God’s word, and that word of God stated that Jesus was the Last Adam. Jesus could most certainly have been married, there is no sin in that, BUT He could not possibly have had any Children or God’s word would not refer to Jesus as the Last Adam. That means that any wives that Jesus may have had would have been barren and NOT mentioning them would have been typical. Note that throughout all the Bible, unless there was no male heir, the daughters are not mentioned unless a great blessing or tragedy happened to them.
Naamah is mentioned because she is the first daughter mentioned. Dinah is mentioned because she was taken without her father’s permission by Shechem.
So if Jesus had a wife and no children whatsoever, then of course the wife would not be mentioned. Mentioning her in juxtaposition to Jesus would not make sense either. She might be given some honor that would have detracted from the Glory of the only son of God, begotten, not made.
For those of you who are having conniption fits because I even addressed this frequently asked question. This is neither a conservative nor liberal Bible topic. Bible scholars from all spectrums agree, we simply cannot know if Jesus was married but the fact that he was a Jewish teacher indicates it’s highly unlikely that he was single. Rabis, and all men in Hebrew society, were expected to be married.